Supreme Court Protects Free Speech for Counselors: What Does This Mean For Massachusetts?

In a significant win for free speech, the United States Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy” very likely violates the First Amendment rights of a licensed therapist. In an 8–1 decision, the Court sided with Kaley Chiles, who challenged the law as an unconstitutional limit on what she could say to her clients.  The Colorado … Read More

BREAKING: Supreme Court Sends Clear Signal that Secret Gender Transition Policies are Unconstitutional 

Yesterday evening, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a remarkable decision that struck a major blow against secret gender transition policies in public schools across the country.  We’ve been keeping you informed about these despicable policies in Massachusetts public schools, which require teachers to lie to parents about their own children and cover up students’ gender dysphoria. In 2022, we filed … Read More

Court Dismisses PRC Smear Campaign Case; We Plan to Appeal

We’ve been keeping you informed about our federal lawsuit against Maura Healey, the Department of Public Health, and their cronies, who ran a million-dollar smear campaign against pro-life pregnancy resource centers (PRCs). Over the past year and a half, MLLC and ACLJ have been actively litigating this case, seeking to achieve justice for PRCs that were slandered and … Read More

Standing for What Matters Most: Massachusetts Liberty Legal Center’s Work in 2025

2025 was a significant year for the Massachusetts Liberty Legal Center (MLLC). Just one year after its launch, MLLC is now serving as counsel in ten active cases, each of which presents the potential to meaningfully reshape Massachusetts law in key areas such as parental rights, religious liberty, and the sanctity of life. Below are brief … Read More

BREAKING: Major Victory for Christian Foster Parents as DCF Retreats

The Massachusetts Liberty Legal Center is overjoyed to announce what can only be described as a Christmas gift come early — a significant initial victory in our federal lawsuit, Jones v. Mahaniah, brought against officials at the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families.  In partnership with Alliance Defending Freedom and First & Fourteenth PLLC, we filed this case on behalf of devoted Christian foster … Read More

Lawsuit Filed Against Lexington Public Schools for Violating Religious Opt-Out

Massachusetts Liberty Legal Center and American Center for Law and Justice Represent the Plaintiff Father  Boston, MA – Massachusetts Liberty Legal Center (MLLC) and American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) attorneys recently filed suit against Lexington Public Schools on behalf of a Christian father whose Kindergarten-age child was exposed to LGBTQ-themed storybooks in direct … Read More

Massachusetts Liberty Legal Center Files Lawsuit Against DCF For Banning Christian Foster Parents

Complaint Alleges Massachusetts is Forcing Loving Christian Foster Families Out Amid a Severe Shortage of Homes Yesterday, Massachusetts Liberty Legal Center, along with our partners at Alliance Defending Freedom and First & Fourteenth PLLC, filed a complaint in federal court against Massachusetts Department of Children and Families officials on behalf of two Christian foster families. … Read More

Medina v. Planned Parenthood Analysis

On June 26th, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, affirming the right of states, such as South Carolina, to redirect taxpayer funding away from abortion providers like Planned Parenthood. This ruling marks a significant victory for the pro-life movement, which has long sought to protect the conscience … Read More

United States v. Skrmetti Analysis

On June 18th, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a major victory for children and families in United States v. Skrmetti, upholding Tennessee’s law banning dangerous gender transition procedures for minors. In a 6–3 ruling, the Court rightly affirmed that states have a legitimate interest in protecting children from irreversible medical harm. It rejected the radical claim that … Read More