The Supreme Court’s recent decisions have sent shockwaves through the legal and cultural landscape of our nation. But what do they mean for us here in Massachusetts? Massachusetts Liberty Legal Center has taken the time to carefully analyze each ruling, cutting through the noise to provide you with clear, concise insights.
Explore the summaries below, and click on the case that impacts you to read our full legal analysis and what it means for citizens across the Commonwealth.
Mahmoud v. Taylor
In a 6-3 decision issued on June 27th, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that religious parents have the constitutional right to opt their children out of classroom materials that promote views on gender and sexuality that substantially interfere with their ability to raise their children in their faith. The case, Mahmoud v. Taylor, centered on the Montgomery County, Maryland Board of Education’s 2022 decision to eliminate parental notice and opt-out options for newly introduced LGBTQ storybooks aimed at pre-K through fifth-grade students.
Mahmoud will have broad and far-reaching implications for Massachusetts parents, who can now wield this decision to ensure that public schools respect their rights to opt out of content that substantially interferes with their ability to raise their children in their faith. As with the plaintiffs in Mahmoud, parents can now demand notice and an opportunity to opt their children out of storybooks or other materials which promote views on LGBTQ issues that conflict with their religious beliefs…
Get the Full PictureFree Speech Coalition v. Paxton
On June 27th, the U.S. Supreme Court decided on behalf of child protection in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, upholding Texas’s age-verification law for online pornography. In a 6-3 ruling, the Court found that commercial websites containing a certain percentage of content obscene to minors could be required to verify the age of visitors, despite the incidental burdens to adult site visitors.
Paxton clears the way for the Massachusetts legislature to do the right thing and pass a similar age-verification law for online pornography sites…
Get the Full PictureUnited States v. Skrmetti
On June 18th, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a major victory for children and families in United States v. Skrmetti, upholding Tennessee’s law banning dangerous gender transition procedures for minors. In a 6–3 ruling, the Court rightly affirmed that states have a legitimate interest in protecting children from irreversible medical harm. It rejected the radical claim that these laws are discriminatory and instead made clear: laws like Tennessee’s don’t target children for who they are—they prohibit experimental, harmful procedures based on a diagnosis of “gender dysphoria.”
While it is unlikely that the Massachusetts legislature will pass a law similar to South Carolina’s in the near future, Skrmetti paves the way for decisive action at the federal level. For example, the Trump administration could attempt to strip Medicaid funding from any healthcare provider that engages in pediatric gender transition procedures…
Get the Full PictureMedina v. Planned Parenthood
On June 26th, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, affirming the right of states, such as South Carolina, to redirect taxpayer funding away from abortion providers like Planned Parenthood. This ruling marks a significant victory for the pro-life movement, which has long sought to protect the conscience rights of taxpayers and prevent public funds from supporting the murder of unborn children…
Get the Full PictureHelp us continue to defend family values and provide pro bono legal support to families in Massachusetts by making a contribution today. Your generous support empowers our mission to uphold faith, family, and freedom for future generations.
Donate Today!